Here are comments that we received from peers and lecturers on the assessment day:
- "great enthusiasm for the project and brand"
- "clear identification of problem areas/room for improvement within brand"
- "sometimes more descriptive than analytical"
- "good visuals"
- "presentation could have benefited from more rehearsals, could have been better"
- "good timing in presentation"
- "outfits helped to enhance visuals"
- "survey monkey was a good idea"
Here is the peer and lecturer feedback from the day, presented in my sketchbook with the quecards from the presentation:
STUDENT FEEDBACK FORM
Course: Fashion
Communication & Promotion
Module title: Visual Awareness
Module code: FASH10105
Credits: 60
Project:
Brand Presentations
|
STUDENTS:
Group 2 Team 8
Whitley Miller
Georgia Green
Courtney Welham
Amy Dennett
Alice Hoar
|
|
TUTOR: AF / SB
|
||
ASSESSMENT DATE: 5th / 6th Dec 2013
|
||
Feedback on formative/summative assessment (Please delete as appropriate)
|
||
Tutors comments:
Brand Jack Wills
Areas of strength
·
New Concept – well justified.
·
Very good on brand background
and brand ambassadors
·
Ubiquity – identify the Superdry syndrome
·
Good to speak with a design students
·
Evidence
of lots of research here, well done.
·
Good attempt to sell your pitch.
·
Well done for using Survey Monkey! Good
primary research.
·
Layout of slides are simple, but strong.
·
New concept – a considered summary if
rather ‘skirting’.
·
Good document of meetings and agendas.
Areas to improve
·
Little
mention of the cultural references associated to the brand–
more analysis needed on these.
There was more a historical account of the brand instead.
·
Visualisation moodboard needed to show
the relationship between cultural connections to Vivienne Westwood and Jack
Wills? Westwood seems
odd match – she wouldn’t do it?!
Would media come to Chatsworth and would these celebs work with JW?
·
Need to provide references to facts and
evidence on first slide. This
was a brief history, and did not include their influences or what inspires
the brand – what are the cultural references they use??
·
Brand essence - very small font.
·
Too much on retail – unbalanced. Communication touch points listed
but more analysis needed, i.e. also incl. some stats.
·
More constructive criticism needed on competitors and consumers.
·
Spoke too quickly. Too
quick on perceptual map.
·
Generally need more detail and
insight – less factual, more perceptive.
Student self-evaluation
completed: no
|
Overall banding: Mid 2:2
No comments:
Post a Comment